Political Animals. They only love us when they’re not busy hating us.

You say you’re a bitch like it’s a bad thing. Don’t you know that bitches get shit done?

The Pilot (or whatever we’re calling it; the first part of a “limited series blahblah”) of Political Animals is a tough nut to crack. I was looking forward to the premiere, based mainly on it’s cast, all of whom have either been in some things I’ve loved or I love them individually as actors. I was especially looking forward to the dynamic between the female leads, Sigourney Weaver and Carla Gugino. However, while those scenes shined, and Greg Berlanti damn well sure knows how to write quippy lines (there are plenty in the quotes section down below), the surrounding stuff was pretty trope-y, not particularly original, and in some cases slightly problematic. I’m always one to give shows the benefit of the doubt when it comes to Pilots; Pilots and their expositionary obligations are tough.

First though, let’s start with a quick (okay I lied it’s kinda long, but there’s gifs! Gifs make everything better!) run-down of the basic set-up of the show.

The basic set-up is that this is sort of an alternate universe version of the Clinton… situation. Sigourney Weaver plays Elaine Barrish, the former First Lady to President Bud Hammond (played by Ciarán Hinds aka Julius Motherfucking Caesar from Rome). As President, Bud was exposed as a serial philanderer, but since the public viewed Elaine as an ice queen “political animal”, they thought a manwhore President was roguish. Elaine and Bud have twin sons who grew up as teenagers in the White House: golden boy Douglas (played by the adorable James Wolk), who can do no wrong, and troubled Thomas aka T.J. (Sebastian Stan, who is great but has mostly terrible luck with roles), the first openly gay child of a President, who was forced to come out (outed?) as a First Son. Since then he’s been in and out of rehab for a cocaine addiction and all sorts of other self-destructive behavior. Finally, there’s Elaine’s mother Margaret (Ellen Burstyn) who is the typical cynical, booze-pickled loose cannon who’s not allowed to talk to the press.

We open on a political party, what I believe is at least a few years after Bud’s presidency, which provides a nice introduction the the members of Hammond family. Elaine has chosen to run for President, but tonight is conceding the Democratic nomination to her opponent (and future President) Paul Garcetti (Adrian Pasdar). Afterwards, Elaine complains about campaigning, “an Olympic sport in hypocrisy” and says that she hates lying. However, while Bud blusters and boasts about how he’s not going to support Garcetti in his campaign, basically being his typical self-centered bastard self, Elaine shuts that shit down. She knows Garcetti is going to win because he believes the lie. Then, as she leaves the room to head home, BAMF Elaine arrives for good: “And Bud. I want a divorce.” Shut. It. Down.

It’s two years later! Elaine’s now Secretary of State in Garcetti’s administration, being interviewed by Susan Berg (Carla Gugino). Elaine pretty much loathes Susan, who won a Pulitzer in her 20s for covering Bud’s adultery. Elaine thinks it’s contemptible and a violation of journalistic ethics that Susan would, like, do her job? Report the news? Or as Elaine puts it “launching her career by stepping on the throat of another person’s marriage”. Um, sorry honey, but Susan is not to blame for your cheating scum-bucket of a husband’s infidelity, nor do I think it was unethical for her to report on it. The story and possibly “one little comment about her epitomizing the death of feminism” also caused Susan to be banned from the White House for the remaining 6 years of the Hammond presidency. Couldn’t even go to the Easter Egg Roll. That’s way harsh, Elaine.

This disparaging of Susan’s journalistic ethics and talent is repeatedly mentioned throughout this episode, at one point by Margaret in a pretty grossly misogynistic way, and yet it’s baffling to me, especially after we learn that Susan finally managed to get this profile of Elaine by leveraging the secret of T.J.’s suicide attempt; she wouldn’t print the story if she could follow Elaine around during the week of Douglas’ engagement party (he’s getting hitched to his long-time girlfriend Ann). Susan was never actually going to print the story, and is pretty much infuriated when it does leak and she loses her visiting privileges again. Basically, I don’t really understand why the Hammonds hate her so damn much.

Back to the interview: Elaine went straight from her concession to enthusiastically campaigning for Garcetti. She’s on record as saying she didn’t want to be Secretary of State, but Garcetti asked and Elaine’s old-West Wing-fashioned, so when the President asked you to serve, you serve (“I serve at the pleasure of the President”). Turns out, she fucking awesome at being Secretary of State. For example, after the Russian foreign minister grabs her ass in the middle of press conference, she says this:

“The next time you touch me I’m going to rip off you tiny shriveled balls and serve them to you in a cold borscht soup.”

Susan ex-posits that with her current approval numbers, if Elaine were to run for President again, she would win by a landslide, but Elaine doesn’t tip her hand to reveal if that’s in the cards for her (spoiler alert: it is). Elaine cuts the bullshit and asks what Susan’s goal is in trading T.J.’s secret (which is, apparently, actual news, while the President’s man-whoring wasn’t?) for a profile of the Secretary of State. Susan is straight up:

“Like any good reporter, I want the truth. Why did you ask your ex-husband for a divorce that night? Was he too much political baggage for you to re-create yourself in the face of such a set-back? Or did you just think your political career was over so you no longer had to tolerate his rampant infidelity? Were you surprised at the public’s reaction to the split? That the president was suddenly despised for the same repugnant sexual behavior the country used to find roguish and cute? That you were suddenly beloved after having been viewed for so long as a cold and calculating political animal? And lastly, do you regret staying with him for so long? Was it worth it, if you didn’t get the grand prize, the gold, glittering tiara of the presidency?”

We don’t hear her answer, or lack thereof.

Elaine bitches (pun intended) about having to do this profile to her son Douglas, who is her chief of staff (which I find questionable). Tonight’s a “salon”, some sort of pre-engagement party party, I guess? The whole Hammond clan will be there, including Bud, whom Elaine hasn’t seen in the 2 years since their divorce. Ann’s parents will be there too, as well as a Japanese diplomat (which Ann awesomely calls out later as being sort of racist, since her parents were both born in America), and Susan Berg.

Back at the office, we find out that Susan is dating and living with her editor, but it’s painfully obvious that he’s cheating on her with the newspaper’s blogger Georgia. Re Georgia: “I don’t trust her. If Eve Harrington were an actual person today she would look like Georgia. She would bake cupcakes, and she would have a blog.” Ugh, bloggers. Aren’t they the worst? Writing on the internet obviously means you’re an idiot. [/sarcasm] Susan also calls out the double standard of their inter-office relationship: “You’re a guy, and my boss. We kiss at the office you get high-fives, I get glares from people who think ‘that whore is sleeping with our editor’”. Fucking sexism, man. But then she apologizes! For expressing her weak, womanly emotions! Sigh.

No time for that though! There’s a crisis!! We get the run-down in the Situation Room: three journalists in Iran have been arrested and interrogated into signing a confession that they are American spies (and this) (they aren’t, btw, which Elaine makes sure to clarify). The Iranian president is promising a swift (sham) trial and the death penalty unless President Garcetti personally travels to Iran to negotiate their release, which is out of the question. And apparently TPTB have known about this for hours and were trying to handle this hostage crisis “internally” WITHOUT INFORMING THE SECRETARY OF STATE, THE LEADING DIPLOMAT. The President’s chief of staff solidifies his spot as the silver medalist in the Douche-canoe Olympics (he’s have to work really hard to oust Bud from the top spot) by being all “we didn’t want to both you, what with your son’s engagement and all”. Punch him in the throat, Elaine. Do it now. Go all Ripley on his ass.

Now, they want Elaine to present a press statement to calm the American people. Elaine’s a professional adult, but Douglas, a child, throws a mini temper tantrum about that, for which Elaine later repeatedly smacks him over the head (and then smooths his hair down; it’s a total mother/son moment and it’s wonderful).

Elaine isn’t happy about being dicked around by the President, but she’s focused on doing anything she can to get the journalists home safely. She also wonders why this is happening now, since it isn’t really logical. I’ll spare you the rest of the details and just get to the reveal (suffice to say, Elaine does the badass move of getting around the President’s cockblocking and uses the gross Russian diplomat in order to get the truth out of an Iranian diplomat). The the President knew exactly what was up because the Iranian Khan called him to tell him. Even though Garcetti said no, that Iranian rascal did it anyway! It’s a ploy by the Khan in order to get the ultra-conservatives on his side by killing Americans, because before he dies of pancreatic cancer he wants to open negotiations to freeze Iran’s nuclear program, and the President is just going to let that happen, I guess?

We’ll zip through most of the rest. There was the “salon”. Margaret said that bitchy, misogynistic shit to Susan. Susan intuited during dinner that Elaine still has feelings for Bud, which Susan thinks is mostly just sad. She doesn’t understand how Elaine, who got an 8 minute standing ovation for her law school valedictorian speech, “sat out the next 20 years of her life catering to a man who repeatedly cheated on her.” Because the (unoriginal) theme of this show is awesome ladies who are amazing in their professional lives and are massive failures in their personal ones.

T.J. seems to be doing better, until his parents deny him the money to invest in a nightclub venture, which causes him to relapse into doing lines, drinking, and having anonymous sex, which isn’t helped when the story of his suicide his leaked. Susan told her editor boyfriend, in the context of boyfriend not editor, about the deal she made, she was never planning on writing it, because “it isn’t news” and it’s “disgusting and exploitative”. He of course tells Georgia because he’s sleeping with her and Georgia posted it on her blog. Editor boyfriend, Bronze medalist in the Douche Olympics, actually blames his cheating on her reluctance to commit and not wanting to get married and her focus on her job, all “it’s not easy to love you”. Go die in a fire.

Douglas and Ann are fighting about the hassles of a political marriage. Also, Ann is bulimic, because, of course.

Elaine and Bud have a chat during the salon about their boys and when life was simpler. Bud turns on the Southern charm, and also shows his political prowess by advising her on the hostage situation. After T.J.’s suicide story leaks, she meets up with Bud at a motel to have sex, and then decides to recommend to the President to send him to Iran to negotiate the release of the hostages (just like Bill). ‘Course, that was Bud’s plan all along, which Elaine gets pissed about, but Bud makes a not untrue point: they were using each other. “Shit, you aren’t pissed because I wanted you to ask me, you’re pissed because I thought of it first, and I wasn’t playing you any more than you were playing me. Did we sleep together because of politics, sure. But it was also about love. Always about both with us, baby. That’s our story. Now we were made for each other. We were made to fight for this country; we were made to fight together and we’re not done, not by a long shot.”

Bud proclaims his love and says he’s not giving up on them; Elaine proclaims they are done. I wonder which one will be right? (Not). As Elaine and her Secret Service agent drive away, Sigourney Weaver bursts into this amazing, hysterical, slightly sad fit of giggles. Sometimes the only thing you can do is laugh. She calls up and decides to meet with Susan, at the National Zoo, by the elephants (because Elaine loveeeeees the elephants [which is maybe a tiny bit ironic, since she's a Dem], and because this show is called “Political Animals”).

Susan apologizes again for the story leaking, and explains about her cheating ex-boyfriend, but now she understands why Elaine took so long to leave Bud. Actually this exchange is so well done I feel like the whole thing ought to be here.

“Thank you for seeing me. I found out the story was my fault. I inadvertently leaked it. I told my editor, who I’m sleeping with. He told the other woman he’s also sleeping with, a fellow journalist.”
“I’m sorry to hear that. Genuinely.”
“Thought you’d appreciate the irony.”
“That may be the meanest thing you’ve said about me.”
“Well, you haven’t read my columns. They were pretty mean.”
“I may have read a few of your columns.”
“For years I wrote about you being an affront to women because you stayed with your husband. Like most I believed it was because of your political ambitions. Then when I went to pack tonight, it was one of the hardest things I’ve ever had to do.”
“I stayed because I loved him.”
“I know. So why’d you finally leave?”
“Because after 30 years, in that moment, exhausted from the campaign, I finally had the strength to. I never answer the question because there is no article, no book that can explain the complexities of a single marriage.”

Elaine gives Susan the exclusive on Bud going to Iran (which should also supplant the T.J. story); Elaine’s pulling a Harvey Spector with the President: either he sends Bud or she resigns. Susan wants to be on that plane, “because if the current Secretary of State sends her ex-husband to rescue a bunch of hostages in Iran and it works, I want that story. I need that story.” I’m guessing she’ll get it.

Elaine gives a thematically appropriate little speech about elephants: “Beautiful creatures, aren’t they? Majestic, fearsome, but still gentle. They move slower than most animals, but they travel just as far. But that isn’t what I love most about them. They’re a matriarchal society. And when the males reach their mating age, the females kick them the hell out of the herd.” She gets in her car and tells her agent, “I’m going to run for President again, and this time I’m going to win.” Fuck yeah.

Oy, that was a lot, I’m sorry. Without a doubt the best parts were the conversations between Elaine and Susan, so much more of that please. There were also some other really good quotes.

  • “If the American people actually knew how this government ran there would be one big, collective upchuck the size of which FEMA would have to clean up.” “We probably shouldn’t start the press conference with that.”
  • “It’s the diplomatic equivalent of instructions from IKEA. None of it makes any sense.”
  • “Are you two really drinking already?” “TJ started it. He said that you can’t make margaritas with Jack Daniels.” “Turns out you can, and it’s good.”
  • “I didn’t get all the gay genes, but I got the style one.”
  • “It’s always important to look your best when you feel your worst.”
  • “I must be the highest ranking co-dependent in the country.”

  • “I did read your book about the impending 4thwave of feminism. Not bad.”
    “No one read my book.”
    “Maybe it was the title: “When Bitches Rule””
    “I was trying to reclaim the word.”
    “Might have impacted your sales. After all, never call a bitch a bitch. Us bitches hate that.”
  • “How do you do it? Even people like me who have criticized you really do admire your resolve.”
    “My usual answer is that I share the ethos with most Americans: if you work hard and give it everything you got, tomorrow will be better than today.”
    “And the truth?”
    “Most of life is hell. It’s filed with failure and loss. People disappoint you. Dreams don’t work out. Hearts get broken. Innocent journalists die. And the best moments of life, when everything comes together, are few and fleeting. But you’ll never get to the next great moment if you don’t keep going. So that’s what I do. I keep going.”

    She brought up the Pulitzer.

     

    Wow, word vomit. I apologize for the TL;DR. The rest shouldn’t be this bad, now that we’ve gotten through with alllll the Pilot exposition. So what do y’all think> Good? Bad? So-so? Any predictions? Are you willing to wager yet that this will either get picked up for a series (al la Battlestar Galactica) or possibly just get a second “limited run” mini-series? Hit the comments with your thoughts!

Tags: ,

  • Sarah

    Just popping on at lunch to comment quickly–hopefully will be on later with more. Loved your recap, and we agree on much. My favorite line was that Margaret had once called Susan a “Bitch with a capital C”. Classic.

  • Nicole_OCTV

    I agreed with you on pretty much everything too, and so far the Elaine/Susan relationship is my favorite thing about the show. It’s an interesting show, and it’s got some great actors, so I’m definitely planning on sticking with it to the end (or when it gets picked up as a regular series?). I just kind of wish it didn’t share a premiere with Breaking Bad, because I feel like it kind of got buried in the excitement for the return of Walter White (myself included).

    Is it weird that I almost felt nostalgia when the fiance jammed her fingers down her throat in the bathroom? Not for myself, but for the late ’80′s/early ’90′s in general? I feel like that’s the last time I saw an eating disorder portrayed on tv. So Degrassi!

  • Eric Pharand

    It was a mixed-bag. I’ll give it another shot.

  • http://twitter.com/onlymystory Melissa

    I too thought the Elaine/Susan relationship was the best part so far. The only part that really pissed me off though was the Elaine/Bud stuff. I like what Elaine said about her marriage, but the scenes didn’t really flow for me.
    I’m a little curious to see where they go with some of the more cliched characteristics of some of the characters. Granted, cliches exist for a reason but one would hope the show would do things a little differently. I like the idea that Douglas isn’t perfectly happy with his family’s life to add a little conflict. Especially since he’s in more of a position to cause damage. Sure TJ (gah, I just adore Sebastian Stan) has his drug problems but they also seem to be very predictable to everyone. So I like the thought that Douglas could be a bigger problem.
    I do think Ann’s eating disorder is an interesting choice too. Like Nicole mentioned, eating disorders on TV are pretty 90s (and I’m not saying they don’t exist anymore) but it was a much more prevalent and public issue a decade or so ago. And studies are always telling us how these disorders don’t go away. All of which perfectly sets up Ann to be at the age where she might have had an eating disorder in jr high or high school and now the stress is causing a recurrence. Suffice to say, Ann intrigues me.

    I think the biggest thing I’m curious to see now is where the show goes. Are we getting another USA show? Interesting, but ultimately fairly light in terms of drama? Or is the show going to get darker and more intense, along the lines of say an FX drama? It’ll be interesting to see how it develops.

  • http://twitter.com/sjopierce SJP

    Great recap! First thing first, can we all agree that this show is somewhat based on the Clintons. It’s pretty obvious don’t you think? Or maybe it’s just me who thinks this because I live in AR where EVERYTHING is about the Clintons pretty much.

    Anyway, I did enjoy the show but especially loved the Elaine/Susan stuff. Give me more of that please… AND James Wolk shirtless. Definitely need more shirtless Wolk.

  • http://www.twitter.com/ReelStina Lemonade

    I think it’s a mix of the Clintons and the Kennedys. The Bill/Hillary connections are very obvious, and James Wolk reminds me a bit of JFK Jr. Plus, wasn’t Carolyn Bessette rumored to have an eating disorder? It was the 1st thing I thought of when they showed Ann at the toilet. And Nicole’s right, eating disorders are SO ’80s/’90s! Gag me with a spoon! :P

    I enjoyed this ep, but I definitely found it a bit unoriginal. I’m hoping the cliches are there just to set up the characters, and now we’ll see them breaking down the stereotypes.

    Agree with everything y’all have said, and looking forward to tonight’s 2nd ep to see where they go next. Thanks for the great recap!

  • http://twitter.com/twinkiesandwine Laura

    Thank you! Yeah, I think it’s very Clinton-y, which has been mentioned by a lot of the reviews. (I mentioned it in my 3rd paragraph, but I didn’t think i was qualified to speak in too much detail about Clinton parralels, since I was 7 or 8 when the Monica Lewinsky clusterfuck happened and 10 when he left office, so I’m too young to have been able to fully understand what was going on at the time. I’ll leave those comments/comparisons to those more experienced.

    I agree, more Wolk shirtless (and Seb Stan as well) and more Elaine+Susan. I would watch a whole show of them just shooting the breeze, tbh.

  • http://twitter.com/twinkiesandwine Laura

    Pilots usually are. I would have to think for awhile to determine a show that had a perfect Pilot. Pilot’s by their very nature are tricky.

  • http://twitter.com/twinkiesandwine Laura

    I didn’t mention that quote because I honestly wasn’t sure exactly what they meant by that. Was that a work around for c**t? That’s the only thing I could think of, but maybe I have the dumb.

  • http://twitter.com/twinkiesandwine Laura

    I think the biggest obstacle with going forward with a regular series would be Weaver’s film schedule. If she’s busy shooting, say Avatar 2, (plus her Imdb page lists her in another film in pre-production) (plus there’s Sebastian Stan and Cap America: Winter Solider) they might be forced to either do another limited series run, or not be able to shoot and air another part until much later (sort of like wi.th British dramas). There’s also the option of doing an American HorroR Story sort of thing and have a 2nd part that is mostly (or completely) unrelated to the first. Maybe about Susan’s travails as sort of an Anderson Cooper international correspondent reporting from disasters/war zones/etc. Actually, now that I think about it that wouldo be kind of awesome.

    Well I know Blair Waldorf on Gossip Girl struggled Keith bulimia in early seasons, but the show seems to have forgotten that. Hanna on Pretty Little Liars also had an eating disorder, and though I haven’t actually watched it, I’m guessing it’s come up on the new 90210. It just seemed like a cliche little insert, like the writers were all, ” oh, we should give some problem to Ann! What is a lady problem? I know, eating disorder! Done!” Hopefully she will get more characterization later on, but there are so many storylines, I’m not convinced right now this one is necessary for the show.

    I am glad I’m not on the Breaking Bad train; I have too many Sunday shows already!

  • http://twitter.com/twinkiesandwine Laura

    I thought the Elaine/Bud stuff added interesting depth to Elaine; maybe I’m just sympathetic to lady characters who are awesome in their professionals lives and kind of train wrecks in their personal lives. I’m curious how that element will develop.

    I didn’t consider that Douglas could end up being something of a saboteur. Maybe Ann might get all Lady Macbeth, figuring that if she’s going to be a Hammond, she’s not going to settle for her and Douglas to continue to live in Elaine and Bud’s shadows. Or maybe the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree and Douglas might end up being the cheating type? I wonder if Susan would be in such a “I don’t give a fuck” headspace personally that she would find irony in being the “other woman”. Ok, now I’m just spit-balling

    I’m wondering about that too. I think it will probably fall somewhere in the middle. The pilot was pretty clunky with its more risqué sexual scenes; it was more than they’d usually go for in a “traditional” USA show, but wayyyyy less than FXt would do. Either way, I’m a USA show junkie (and do lot of FX too) so either is fine with me.

  • http://twitter.com/twinkiesandwine Laura

    I think it’s a combo of all the 20th century political dynasties; I’m wondering if their might be some Bush elements that show up.

    I agree. I don’t mind the clichés as long as they don’t stick to them. Hopefully they’re setting up these things as very predictable in order to psych out the audience; hope they zig where we expect them to zag.

    Eating disorders actually still seem to be prevalent in pop culture, but in teen/CW-type shows. Not that it’s not interesting to see it as a trait of a slightly older character. It’s just a little bit less, I don’t know, expected? Hopefully it goes somewhere interesting.

    Thanks for the nice comment!

  • Eric Pharand

    By mixed bag, I meant close to equal parts good and bad. Pilots shouldn’t be a mixed bag.

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline
Better Tag Cloud